Archive for the 'renegotiation' Category

Always Cut Your Commission!

Yeah, that’s right!   “Always Cut Your Commission!”  And, why not?  If the only value you can offer your clients is your price, then you probably will have to cut your commissions to stay in business!

Actually, let’s clarify what is often referred to as “Commission Cutting.”  It simply means that one broker is willing to sell his or her services at a lower rate than he or she would for other projects, or perhaps in comparison to his or her competitors.  So what?  Does that mean every one in the local market must sell their services at the same price?  If you buy shoes from one store at a low price, does that mean that all of the other shoe stores will lose all of their customers and go out of business, just because you got a good deal?

Just like in other industries, there exist many common practices in commercial real estate, including those surrounding broker compensation.  But, no “standard” compensation or commission structure exists.  In fact, in most states, setting commission standards is considered price-fixing, and is illegal!

So, what’s all this noise about brokers who cut their commissions and how that supposedly affects the compensation of other brokers?  The response I often hear is that if one broker offers low-priced services then every landlord, tenant, buyer, and seller in that market will make the same demands.  Really?  Well, guess what?  They already want your services at the lowest possible price.  Shouldn’t they?  Don’t you want to buy those shoes as inexpensively as possible?  Don’t you negotiate for a lower price when you buy or lease a car?  Didn’t you negotiate when you bought your home?  Did everyone else get their home for the same price you did?  Of course not!  Seeking a lower price is the American way, and there isn’t a darned thing wrong with it.

Ask yourself these questions:

  • Are you a low-cost service provider?
  • Is low-cost always the winner?

NO!  If that were true, there would not exist high-priced hotels, restaurants, resorts, clothes, homes, cars, etc., etc., etc., or anything of better quality.  If low price always won, consumers and businesses would never buy the best quality or engage the best of any service provider.  Instead, they would only hire the cheapest.  And, in those instances, they’d get what they paid for.

Forget what other brokers do.  There is plenty of room in every industry for low-cost service providers, because some clients do make purchasing and hiring decisions purely on cost.  Low cost, almost always means low quality, and those who hire only on a low-cost basis typically receive services commensurate with what they pay.  And, if that’s their preference, so be it!

The answer here is very simple:  If you are a low-cost service provider, be the best one in your market.  If, on the other hand, you wish to be something other than low-cost, make sure that like Mercedes, BMW, Nobu, Gucci, and other fine products and service providers, you provide your clients with such incredibly valuable services, experiences, and outcomes, that your other-than-low-price will be warranted and you will be in demand!

About Real Estate Strategies Corporation

Real Estate Strategies Corporation is a respected corporate advisory and transaction services firm that provides thought-leadership, decision-making, planning, project management, and transaction execution services to financial and senior executives at management team-led public, private, and portfolio companies, and not-for-profit organizations.  Under the leadership of its award-winning CEO, Andrew B. Zezas, RealStrat’s clients engage the firm when acquiring, disposing, renegotiating, or enhancing occupied leased or owned real estate in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and throughout North America. By creating and executing Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions and identifying hidden Opportunities, RealStrat drives greater operational and financial performance in support of its clients’ stakeholder objectives, M&A requirements, and exit strategies.

In the current economic environment, RealStrat’s efforts are focused on uncovering, capturing, and re-purposing hidden liquidity and minimizing risk in its clients’ leased and owned real estate.  The firm provides counsel as to competitive advantage strategies in preparation for the eventual economic recovery.  Visit www.RealStrat.com.

Read about timely commercial real estate issues at RealStrat’s blog at www.CorporateAdvisor.wordpress.com. Follow RealStrat at http://www.Twitter.com/RealStrat.

LINKS:

RealStrat News
Biographies
Articles
Properties
What Our Clients Say
AndrewZezas.com

For additional profiles, pictures, and more click here or go to http://realstratnews.wordpress.com/media-information/.

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2011. All Rights Reserved.

###

Advertisements

Brokers Compensation is Performance Based…But, Who Must Perform?

I love it when some commercial landlords claim that the commissions they pay to commercial real estate brokers should be conditioned on whether a tenant performs or defaults under a lease.  Some landlords insist that they should not be required to make future commission payments if tenants default.  Some go so far as to demand reimbursement of commissions by real estate brokers when tenants default.

Many commercial landlords argue that commissions should be paid based on the value landlords derive when tenants pay rent.  Those landlords claim that if a tenant defaults in paying rent, then the landlord’s value is diminished, and the commercial real estate broker should somehow be responsible for that default and should not be entitled to its full compensation.

This is simply an issue where commercial landlords attempt to pass on their risk to real estate brokers, as a result of landlords not performing the due diligence necessary to protect their own interests.  Do landlords really believe that real estate brokers are capable of analyzing the financial abilities of commercial tenants?  Do landlords really expect brokers to act as credit analysts and insurers of tenant creditworthiness?

Sure, the compensation of commercial real estate brokers is performance based.  But, to who’s performance does that relate?  Not the tenant’s performance!  Real estate brokers are not compensated based on the performance of their tenants. That’s why most courts of law have found that a real estate broker’s commission is due when the lease is executed by landlord and tenant, not at the end of the lease after the tenant has performed its obligations. So, from a landlord’s perspective, a commercial real estate broker should be paid for its own performance, for “delivering” a tenant, not for what that tenant does or doesn’t do after the landlord has accepted the tenant and after the landlord has freely elected to enter into a transaction with that tenant.

In fact, a commercial real estate broker working on behalf of a tenant may receive payment from the landlord, who is, in turn reimbursed by the tenant for the cost of the broker’s compensation along with other costs through payment of rent.  So, because tenants reimburse landlords for real estate broker compensation, some courts of law have held that, in fact, it is the tenant that actually pays the broker’s commission.

The world has changed and business, especially commercial real estate, has become a riskier industry.  Companies that appear to be healthy may not be, or may become unhealthy and default on their obligations at a later date.  This puts more burden on commercial landlords, and the necessity for them to take greater steps to protect their interests has become even more important.  For the record, it is not only tenants that can become unhealthy….

The issue of whether landlords should place the burden of tenant default on the backs of commercial real estate brokers has been an on-going source of debate, both in this blog, in LinkedIn, and in the commercial real estate industry.  And, so long as some commercial landlords, not the best or strongest landlords, mind you, unfairly attempt to shift their obligations and risks onto commercial real estate brokers, unfortunately this discussion will continue.

However, as the commercial landlord industry consolidates and becomes more sophisticated, that out-dated mentality of “stick-it-to the-real-estate-brokers” appears to be fading away, as greater numbers of commercial landlords recognize the benefits they derive from commercial real estate brokers representing tenants and the commissions to which those brokers are rightfully entitled.

 

About Real Estate Strategies Corporation
Real Estate Strategies Corporation is a respected corporate advisory and transaction services firm that provides thought-leadership, decision-making, planning, project management, and transaction execution services to finance and senior executives at management team-led public, private, and portfolio companies, and not-for-profit organizations.  Under the leadership of its award-winning CEO, Andrew Zezas, RealStrat’s clients engage the firm when acquiring, disposing of, renegotiating, or enhancing occupied leased or owned real estate in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and throughout North America.  By creating and executing Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions and identifying hidden Opportunities, RealStrat drives greater operational and financial performance in support of its clients’ stakeholder objectives, M&A requirements, and exit strategies.

In the current economic environment, RealStrat’s efforts are focused on uncovering, capturing, and re-purposing hidden liquidity and minimizing risk in its clients’ leased and owned real estate.  The firm provides counsel as to competitive advantage strategies in preparation for the eventual economic recovery.  Visit www.RealStrat.com. Read about timely commercial real estate issues at RealStrat’s blog at www.CorporateAdvisor.wordpress.com.   Follow RealStrat at http://www.Twitter.com/RealStrat.

LINKS:

RealStrat News
Biographies
Articles
Properties
What Our Clients Say

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2011.  All Rights Reserved.

###

Tenant Creditworthiness…A Complicated Discussion

Commercial landlords and real estate brokers have been forever locked in a battle over the amount and timing of landlord paid compensation, especially when landlords are unsure of the quality and stability of particular tenants.  Landlords contend that because brokers bring tenants to landlords, that those brokers should be responsible for their tenants’ creditworthiness and should participate in the credit and other risks borne by landlords.

I’ve written a lot on this subject. Landlords are in the risk management business. Commercial real estate brokers are in the fee for service business, and are therefore not in the business of accepting the type or quantities of risks that landlords accept. Accordingly, this matter is more appropriately one to be had between landlord and tenant.

The reality is that commercial tenants are responsible for their own creditworthiness, good, bad, or otherwise.  And, while landlords are in the business of bearing acceptable levels of risk, neither landlords or brokers should bear unnecessary or unreasonable amounts of risk on a tenant’s behalf.

In assessing the financial wherewithal of commercial tenants, landlords will consider numerous factors, including a tenant’s:

·         Business history (number of years in business, stability, growth and contraction)

·         Industry stability (software, personnel, other)

·         Place of incorporation

·         Country of origin, treaties between that country and the United States, and the ease or challenge with which a landlord can expect to contend to collect amounts owed, before lease provisions, ensure tenant performance, and more

·         Financial statements and other information provided by tenant

·         Bank references

·         Rent payment history

·         Legal history

·         Creditworthiness

·         Credibility of the management team, investors, and others

·         Tenant’s willingness to proactively provide information and insight, and answer questions

·         Landlord’s ability to understand tenant’s business model and horizon

·         Tenant’s negotiating posture, responsiveness, and reasonableness

·         Tenant’s required business terms, cost of construction and other transaction components

·         Tenant’s desired length of lease term

·         And, more

A landlord’s perception of the riskiness of a particular tenant can affect almost every part of a transaction, including:

·         Annual rental rate

·         Rent increases (amount & frequency)

·         Free rent

·         Construction and other allowances

·         Rights and options to expand, contract, terminate, renew, purchase, other

·         Non-monetary business terms

·         Security deposits

·         And, more

Security deposit requirements can make or break a deal.  Tenants perceived to have superior credit and long-term stability can often expect to pay little or no security.  This can change depending on the particulars of any transaction, including the need for the tenant to secure large construction allowances, free rent, or other monetary concessions and incentives.

Some landlords prefer to receive cash security deposits, while others insist on letters of credit.  Other landlords insist that all cash investments required of them to complete a transaction, including those for construction, commissions, legal and administrative costs, free rent, and more, be secured.  When landlords perceive a tenant to be very risky, they may require that the tenant guarantee all rental payments in some manner.

It must be said that certain landlords, because of their own financial challenges, may inaccurately view certain tenants as more risky than they really are.  The issue of landlord risk is one on which tenants should directly focus before entering into any real estate transaction.

When it comes to securing a real estate transaction, effective communication between landlord and tenant, whether directly or properly coordinated through tenant or landlord brokers, is essential to understanding risk and distributing that risk in a balanced manner in any transaction.

As for brokers acting as guarantor of the tenant’s creditworthiness and performance of lease obligations, that’s about as absurd as brokers guaranteeing landlord credit and performance.  Brokers are fee-for-service professionals, not credit analysts, nor guarantors.  Frankly, if a tenant is viewed by a landlord to be risky, that landlord has many alternatives available to it to mitigate that risk, including not entering into the transaction.  Commercial landlords and tenants each come with their own risk, as do brokers.  Accordingly, each party should be responsible for those risks for which they have traditionally been responsible, and should not seek to unfairly off-load those risks onto others involved in their transactions.

 

About Real Estate Strategies Corporation

Real Estate Strategies Corporation is a respected corporate advisory and transaction services firm that provides thought-leadership, decision-making, planning, project management, and transaction execution services to financial and senior executives at management team-led public, private, and portfolio companies, and not-for-profit organizations.   Under the leadership of its award-winning CEO, Andrew B. Zezas, RealStrat’s clients engage the firm when acquiring, disposing, renegotiating, or enhancing occupied leased or owned real estate in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and throughout North America.  By creating and executing Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions and identifying hidden Opportunities, RealStrat drives greater operational and financial performance in support of its clients’ stakeholder objectives, M&A requirements, and exit strategies.

In the current economic environment, RealStrat’s efforts are focused on uncovering, capturing, and re-purposing hidden liquidity and minimizing risk in its clients’ leased and owned real estate.  The firm provides counsel as to competitive advantage strategies in preparation for the eventual economic recovery.  Visit www.RealStrat.com.

Acquire new ideas about commercial real estate at RealStrat’s blog at http://www.CorporateAdvisor.wordpress.com.   Follow RealStrat and Andrew Zezas at http://www.Twitter.com/RealStrat.

Check out The Executive’s Guide to Understanding Corporate Real Estate Transactions.

Where is Andrew Zezas?

 

 

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2010.  All Rights Reserved.

###

Hire a Broker to Negotiate a Relocation, But Negotiate a Renewal On Your Own…You’re Kidding, Right?

Hire a broker to negotiate a relocation, but negotiate a renewal on your own?  That’s like hiring a dentist to work on only some of your teeth!  What benefit could you derive from that?

When a commercial tenant contemplates relocation or renewal, some landlords will suggest that the tenant engage a real estate advisor, but only to negotiate transactions outside of their current building.  In these instances, the landlord will typically recommend that landlord and tenant negotiate directly on a renewal or other in-place transaction.  This approach is designed to favor the landlord and removes from the tenant the benefit of expert advice and representation it would receive from an advisor on an in-place transaction.  Such an approach also changes the role of the advisor from an objective representative of the tenant, one who has no preference or incentive to sway the tenant toward any particular property or transaction (other than the one that best meets the tenant’s objectives), to that of a salesman who would only be compensated in the event the tenant elected to relocate.

Landlords will suggest that to preserve the relationship, landlord and tenant should negotiate directly.  That’s exactly why a tenant needs an advisor, so the tenant advisor can secure the terms to which the tenant is entitled and, at the same time,  preserve the tenant’s relationship…that is, if a relationship with the landlord is important. 

Other landlords will suggest that by negotiating directly, the landlord won’t have to compensate a tenant advisor, so the tenant’s occupancy costs will be reduced.    Not quite!  In fact, an advisor’s role is to drive down the tenant’s occupancy costs, despite the fact that a commission would be paid.

If the tenant agreed to deal with its existing landlord directly, such action would telegraph to the landlord that the tenant really planed on staying in the landlord’s building.  It would stack the odds in favor of the current landlord and eliminate most, if not all, of the constraints and pressure placed on the landlord through a competitive bidding process.  Moreover, the tenant would lose the objectivity it would otherwise derive by engaging an advisor to provide counsel and to protect its interests across all transactions.

In fact, the presence of a tenant advisor actually benefits the landlord while serving the tenant’s needs.  A knowledgeable advisor, objectively evaluating the implications to the tenant of all alternative transactions, including those  proposed by an existing landlord, could more appropriately guide the landlord as to how to make a deal with the tenant.

Do most tenants engage real estate advisors only to negotiate  relocation transactions, while negotiating on their own with their current landlords?  Not really.  Frankly, if a commercial tenant has the know-how, time, resources, and inclination to negotiate a transaction without an advisor, then it should do that for all transactions, whether relocation or renewal.  Otherwise, if the tenant elects to engage an advisor at all, it should give serious consideration to engaging that advisor across all transactions it may consider, to ensure continuity and objectivity, and to secure the optimal terms, wherever the tenant elects to land.

About Real Estate Strategies Corporation
Real Estate Strategies Corporation is a respected corporate advisory and transaction services firm that provides thought-leadership, decision-making, planning, project management, and transaction execution services to financial and senior executives at management team-led public, private, and portfolio companies, and not-for-profit organizations.   Under the leadership of its award-winning CEO, Andrew B. Zezas, RealStrat’s clients engage the firm when acquiring, disposing, renegotiating, or enhancing occupied leased or owned real estate in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and throughout North America.  By creating and executing Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions and identifying hidden Opportunities, RealStrat drives greater operational and financial performance in support of its clients’ stakeholder objectives, M&A requirements, and exit strategies.

In the current economic environment, RealStrat’s efforts are focused on uncovering, capturing, and re-purposing hidden liquidity and minimizing risk in its clients’ leased and owned real estate.  The firm provides counsel as to competitive advantage strategies in preparation for the eventual economic recovery.  Visit

Acquire new ideas about commercial real estate at RealStrat’s blog at http://www.CorporateAdvisor.wordpress.com.   Follow RealStrat and Andrew Zezas at http://www.Twitter.com/RealStrat.

Check out The Executive’s Guide to Understanding Corporate Real Estate Transactions.

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2010.  All Rights Reserved. 

###

Let’s Put The Landlord in the Poor House, and Other Stupid Statements

How many times have I heard commercial tenants say “I don’t care about the landlord!”?  That’s pretty dumb (and, right up there with landlords who don’t care about their tenants!).  Why wouldn’t a tenant care about the business entity that is responsible for the very foundation (literally, the foundation of the building!), that supports their ability to efficiently and profitably conduct business on a daily basis? 

The role of a tenant advisor is to determine the optimal achievable transaction structure on the tenant’s behalf, advise the tenant as to how it can achieve those terms, and to execute its tenant’s preferred transactions. But, even halfway decent advisors recognize that in order to accomplish this, they must first understand the objectives, risks, and challenges of landlords. 

Understanding your opponent in any contest is the foundation of victory.  Too many unqualified or ill prepared real estate licensees (I use that term here to differentiate this subset of the industry from those who really know what they’re doing!), run their tenants headlong into real estate transactions without really knowing where to go.  These brokers are often long on salesmanship (and telemarketing skills), short on precise knowledge, and even shorter on true expertise. 

Tenants who take a ‘Let’s grab every dime we can!” attitude can shoot themselves in the foot as they either drive the landlord so far that it refuses to enter into a transaction, or jockey the landlord into position such that he / she agrees to bad terms in the hopes of making-up the difference on the next lease, only to put the building in financial jeopardy.  That’s not the best way to protect a tenant’s interests! 

Tenants rarely need every possible right and option under the sun, so that they tie the landlord’s hands and restrict its ability to lease the rest of the space in the building.  Tenants do need leases that provide favorable terms, flexibility, low and predictable costs, with no surprises.  They also require financially sound landlords who can and will provide the services to which they commit. 

Tenants don’t need to put landlords in the poor house.  These days, doing that is a lot easier to accomplish, especially if tenants and their brokers aren’t careful.  Writing as a tenant advocate, landlords need the ability to stay in business, pay their mortgages, refinance their buildings, provide services to tenants, manage risk, sustain their own companies, and “Yes”, generate profits, whether those profits come now or later. 

Mounting a well-planned, well-armed negotiation with commercial landlords requires knowledge, resources, and skill.  Never “bring a knife to a gun fight” as they say.  Commercial landlords can be some of the most well trained, well armed, and aggressive fighters on the business battlefield, and many of them have some pretty big guns.  Accordingly, tenants would be well advised to bring tanks, jet fighters, and battleships, or at least a missle or two when negotiating with certain landlords! 

The special challenge in a successful negotiation, for both tenants and their advisors, is to determine in advance those terms that the tenant really needs to achieve its objectives and to negotiate aggressively to succeed in securing the right terms, while being mindful of keeping their landlord in business.  This is a wise approach, even when dealing with one of those few remaining landlords that doesn’t have a sense of fair play, could care less about the tenant, and is too plain greedy and self-absorbed to recognize the tenant’s good efforts and the true interdependent relationship that, when respected, gives tenants and landlords what they both need…the tools to succeed and prosper.

Real Estate Strategies Corporation is a respected corporate advisory and transaction services firm that provides thought-leadership, decision-making, planning, project management, and transaction execution services to financial and senior executives at management team-led public, private, and portfolio companies, and not-for-profit organizations.   Under the leadership of its award-winning CEO, Andrew B. Zezas, RealStrat’s clients engage the firm when acquiring, disposing, renegotiating, or enhancing occupied leased or owned real estate in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and throughout North America.  By creating and executing Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions and identifying hidden Opportunities, RealStrat drives greater operational and financial performance in support of its clients’ stakeholder objectives, M&A requirements, and exit strategies.

In the current economic environment, RealStrat’s efforts are focused on uncovering, capturing, and re-purposing hidden liquidity and minimizing risk in its clients’ leased and owned real estate.  The firm provides counsel as to competitive advantage strategies in preparation for the eventual economic recovery.  Visit www.RealStrat.com.

Acquire new ideas about commercial real estate at RealStrat’s blog at www.CorporateAdvisor.wordpress.com.   Follow RealStrat and Andrew Zezas at http://www.Twitter.com/RealStrat.

Check out The Executive’s Guide to Understanding Corporate Real Estate Transactions.

Where is Andrew Zezas?

 

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2010.  All Rights Reserved. 

###

Soon To Be In Foreclosure!

You’re not going to believe this story…in this economy…in this real estate market!  I almost can’t believe it myself!  This is real time stuff that  happened to me.

To set the stage, my client is a growing company that is led by a very bright CEO.  He’s young, aggressive, extremely accomplished, highly successful, hard-working, respectful, and takes no prisoners.  He’s a straight shooter who respects straight shooters.  

The tenant occupies office space in a suburban New Jersey building, which is owned by an out-of-state landlord.  This particular landlord promotes the stereotype of the mean and nasty commercial landlord, that dwindling minority of the industry that tries all they can to dominate every tenant and every deal.  This landlord, a cheap suit wearing an open collar, gold chain, and way too much cologne,  demonstrated himself to be arrogant, condescending, self-absorbed, not too bright, somewhat successful despite himself, probably a front man for other people with real money, and based on his antics, someone who still thinks he’s in a landlord’s market where tenants should pay homage to him and be grateful to be occupying his building.  Based on how this landlord handled himself, he is a very strong candidate for president of the local bread line.
Here’s the abridged version of what happened.  You’ll get a kick out of it!
  • Our client, the tenant, sought to renegotiate its existing lease based on current market conditions, or to relocate to another building
  • Our client had uncomfortable dealings with the landlord in the past
  • We submitted an RFP to the landlord’s agent and provided specific guidance as to our tenant’s requirements
  • The landlord’s agent called us with a precise message from the landlord, one that I have never received before:  “The landlord said if you play ball with him, he’ll pay you a commission.  If you make it tough for him, he’ll only pay you half!”  Wow!  How to win friends and influence people!  Was the landlord trying to intimidate us, create a conflict-of-interest, or just bring us over to the dark side?  We advised our client of the conversation.
  • Despite our guidance, the landlord submitted a proposal that was extremely one-sided and did not address our client’s requirements
  • The landlord attempted to circumvent us and meet with our client directly
  • Our client authorized us to arrange a meeting with the landlord, which we did
  • The landlord rescheduled the meeting twice and then swaggered-in 45 minutes late
  • During the meeting, the landlord was disrespectful to our client, speaking down to both the CEO and the President, as well as, to his own agent
  • The landlord arrogantly spoke to me, and after realizing that he was not the most important person in the room and wouldn’t get his way, waved his arms, got up and stormed out
  • Despite our email and voicemail requests for a revised landlord proposal, weeks passed without a reply
  • I finally go the landlord’s agent on the phone one evening, when he sheepishly told me he was not authorized to respond, but didn’t want me to tell that to the tenant…Huh?
  • We received an email directly from the landlord saying we were an impediment (To what…his ability to take advantage of our client?), and telling us that he instructed his agent not to deal with us ever again (Really?  So, I should not bring my next 100,000 sq ft tenant to your building?)
  • Our client said good riddance and instructed us to make a deal elsewhere
  • Our client will be moving into their new facility shortly
  • Oh, and did I mention that the landlord’s building is a 60% vacant class B building that sits way out beyond the western fringe of the central New Jersey market, where very little demand exists even in good times?

Anybody want to buy an office building…cheap?

Real Estate Strategies Corporation is a respected corporate advisory and transaction services firm that provides thought-leadership, decision-making, planning, project management, and transaction execution services to financial and senior executives at management team-led public, private, and portfolio companies, and not-for-profit organizations.   Under the leadership of its award-winning CEO, Andrew B. Zezas, RealStrat’s clients engage the firm when acquiring, disposing, renegotiating, or enhancing occupied leased or owned real estate in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and throughout North America.  By creating and executing Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions and identifying hidden Opportunities, RealStrat drives greater operational and financial performance in support of its clients’ stakeholder objectives, M&A requirements, and exit strategies.

In the current economic environment, RealStrat’s efforts are focused on uncovering, capturing, and re-purposing hidden liquidity and minimizing risk in its clients’ leased and owned real estate.  The firm provides counsel as to competitive advantage strategies in preparation for the eventual economic recovery.  Visit www.RealStrat.com.

Acquire new ideas about commercial real estate at RealStrat’s blog at www.CorporateAdvisor.wordpress.com.   Follow RealStrat and Andrew Zezas at http://www.Twitter.com/RealStrat.

Check out The Executive’s Guide to Understanding Corporate Real Estate Transactions.

Where is Andrew Zezas?

 

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2010.  All Rights Reserved. 

###

Is a Lease Renewal Really a ‘Renewal’ Any More?

Do any companies really just exercise lease renewal options any more?  Don’t most companies negotiate to modify the terms contained in their lease renewal options?  Doesn’t that mean that lease renewals aren’t really ‘renewals’  but, instead are new deals? 

In a recent blog post I asked the question “Do Tenants Really Need Brokers When Negotiating Lease Renewals?”.  When we posted that question in a Corporate Real Estate Group on LinkedIn, a discussion began where numerous brokers, landlords, attorneys, and tenants from around the world added their thoughts.  One particular real estate professional very clearly exclaimed that there is no longer any such thing as a renewal. That made a lot of sense to me because for many years, I’ve viewed renewal options as nothing more than providing tenants with an extra element of future control over their premises.  In almost every transaction in which I’ve been involved where a tenant contemplated remaining in its premises beyond the initial expiration date, instead of exercising renewal options, those companies negotiated new terms.  So, those transactions weren’t “renewals” at all, but were actually new deals with new terms.

What is a renewal?  A renewal is when the previous terms of a lease are… renewed…when a tenant and landlord apply the same terms of a previous lease to a new term.  Except, for years, in almost every renewal clause  certain terms, like rent, almost always change.  So, since rents change, then renewals aren’t REALLY renewals anyway, right?  They’re renewals with changes…new deals!  

Even the kind of renewal where only the rent changes rarely occurs anymore.  In fact, I cannot remember when any of my clients simply sent a letter to their landlord “renewing” their lease. 

Let’s face it…companies that occupy real estate change.  Their employees change in type, function, experience, skill, quantity.  The way they conduct business, the type of businesses they’re in, and so much more, often changes over the 5 or 10 years that they occupy space under a typical lease.  So, it makes sense that their real estate needs will change, too.  That’s why few companies just exercise renewal options anymore. 

Prudence demands that companies examine their operational and financial needs before making major decisions like those about real estate.  Moreover, transparency and disclosure expectations of stakeholders, Boards, and senior management force companies to consider competitive alternatives, examine market availabilities, and secure terms that best suit their businesses in the present day.  Few executives would describe good business practice as automatically entering into real estate transactions on terms created five or ten years earlier, instead of based on their current and anticipated future requirements.

So, are renewal transactions really “renewals” anymore?  Not really!

Please tell me your thoughts on this.

Real Estate Strategies Corporation is a respected corporate advisory and transaction services firm that provides thought-leadership, decision-making, planning, project management, and transaction execution services to financial and senior executives at management team-led public, private, and portfolio companies, and not-for-profit organizations.   Under the leadership of its award-winning CEO, Andrew B. Zezas, RealStrat’s clients engage the firm when acquiring, disposing, renegotiating, or enhancing occupied leased or owned real estate in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and throughout North America.  By creating and executing Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions and identifying hidden Opportunities, RealStrat drives greater operational and financial performance in support of its clients’ stakeholder objectives, M&A requirements, and exit strategies.

In the current economic environment, RealStrat’s efforts are focused on uncovering, capturing, and re-purposing hidden liquidity and minimizing risk in its clients’ leased and owned real estate.  The firm provides counsel as to competitive advantage strategies in preparation for the eventual economic recovery.  Visit www.RealStrat.com.

Acquire new ideas about commercial real estate at RealStrat’s blog at www.CorporateAdvisor.wordpress.com.   Follow RealStrat and Andrew Zezas at http://www.Twitter.com/RealStrat.

Check out The Executive’s Guide to Understanding Corporate Real Estate Transactions.

Where is Andrew Zezas?

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2010.  All Rights Reserved. 

###


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 42 other followers

Follow Me on Twitter

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.



THIS WORK IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PRACTICAL AND USEFUL INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT MATTER COVERED AND REPRESENTS THE OPINION OF THE AUTHOR. HOWEVER, IT IS PROVIDED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE AUTHOR IS NOT ENGAGED IN RENDERING LEGAL, FINANCIAL, ACCOUNTING, OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVICE TO THE READER. IF LEGAL, FINANCIAL, ACCOUNTING, OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVICE IS REQUIRED, THE SERVICES OF A COMPETENT PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE SOUGHT. THE AUTHOR SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY THAT MAY BE INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OR APPLICATION OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS CONTAINED IN THIS WORK.
Advertisements